Years ago, when I first went into therapy, I was a client at a clinic that specialized in abused children, including adults who had been abused as children. Their primary focus was on sexual abuse, but they treated other kinds of abuse as well.
One of the most appalling facts I learned
as a client of this clinic was that a percentage of the abusers had,
themselves, been abused as children. This shocked me…I could not fathom how
someone could suffer the pain and indignity of abuse themselves and then go on
and do it to someone else. I had just assumed, like I suppose most people do,
that if you have suffered from abuse, you will automatically have empathy for
others and, because you know exactly how it feels, you will not do the same to
someone else.
Well, that was a wrong-headed notion
because many of the people with whom I was in a therapy group reported that
their abuser had also been abused as a child, and I found that mind-boggling. Our
therapist explained to us that some people, when victimized, deal with their
feelings of powerlessness by repeating the abuse on people weaker than they
are, therefore allowing them to feel powerful instead of powerless. It made
sense in a detached, clinically-logical kind of way, but still didn’t feel
right. But she was right: “…psychologists at Yale [have] concluded that
30 percent is the best estimate of the rate at which abuse of one generation is
repeated in the next…One of the crucial differences between those abused children who go on to
become abusers and those who do not…is whether they have the insight that their
parents were wrong to abuse them.” In other words, kids who buy into the notion
that they deserved the rough treatment meted out by their parents often do not
see those actions as brutal or even unwarranted, let alone wrong.
This distortion of reality can have varying
consequences. In the case of a person who later says “I was a handful as a kid:
my parents had to be rough with me in order to get my attention,” this person grows
up believing not only that he deserved the abuse he received, he believes it is
the right way to parent an uncooperative child. In my case, even though I was
very clear that I did not deserve her brutality, the very fact that my NM
called them “spankings” instead of the beatings they really were, skewed my
definition of “spanking” for many, many years. As a result, I minimized and
discounted myself by believing I was “merely spanked” rather than forcefully
beaten with a thin leather strap that left whip-like welts all over my tender
legs, buttocks and lower back.
According to Gaia Vince in New Scientist,
“As many as 70% of parents who abuse their children were themselves abused
while growing up.” That, of course, leaves a further 30% of abusive parents who
were not abused in childhood…like my NM.
Humans have a tendency to want to make
order out of chaos. We like to categorize and pigeon-hole things in order to
make them manageable, especially in our minds. It is part of our survival
instinct to learn lessons from our experiences and then generalize them to help
keep us aware and safe. It is also where our deplorable tendency to stereotype
comes from: it is much easier to assign the characteristics of a few to the
many than it is to take the time to get to know each one of the many on an
individual basis. Our social consciousness has been raised to recognize some of
the bigger bugaboos like sexism and racism, but we still sort and
compartmentalize and generalize about other things. And those of us who live
with the legacy of narcissistic parents and families are, in this respect, not
so different from the normies.
We tend to presume, for example, that in
any household in which there is a Golden Child, there is also a Scapegoat, but
that is not necessarily true. My NM is a perfect case in point: she was
definitely the GC, spoilt and coddled by her father as the only girl. But
despite her position as the GC, neither of her brothers were designated nor
treated as scapegoats. And my NM perceived her brothers as the favoured ones
because they had more freedom and privilege than she did, something neither
surprising nor indicative of favouritism in the 1930s and 40s, when my NM was
growing up.
We also tend to presume that anyone who
grew up as the family scapegoat will be empathetic and compassionate and find
narcissistic behaviours to be anathema. This, also, is not necessarily true. Remember,
as much as 30% of people who were abused as children go on to abuse their own
kids and up to 70% of people who abuse their children were, themselves, abused
in childhood. How many of these abusers were themselves scapegoats and, feeling
powerless, went on to assuage that powerlessness by becoming the powerful, the
abuser? How many of them do not identify what happened to them as abuse and so
repeat it with their own kids?
I have met a few scapegoats whom I thought
were peculiarly NM-like, people who emulated and even admired the powerful
people in their lives, even sought out those powerful people in order to gain
favour in their eyes. These people, instead of rejecting the narcissist’s power
paradigm, adopt and embrace it. And while they are clear on their NM’s having
hurt them (and sometimes harbouring considerable anger for their having been
neglected or ignored or blamed), these people seek to heal the hole within
themselves not through therapy and coming to grips with the reality of their
dysfunctional upbringing, but by aligning themselves with a narcissist who will
give them some semblance of the strokes they need in exchange for their loyalty
and devotion.
But we are people cultivated to accept and
be grateful for crumbs. When my brother got new shoes, he got the latest, most
basketball shoe that was popular with the boys…I got ugly saddle oxfords that
went out of style shortly after I was born. But when I complained, NM reminded
me that there were children in Mexico…just
a few miles from us…who have to go school barefoot and who would be grateful
for the ugly shoes, an implication that I could be made to go to school
barefoot that was not lost on me. I had to be grateful for having any shoes at
all: expecting my tastes and desires to be taken into account was excessive.
Conditioned to accept crumbs as children, as adults any kind of positive
attention, no matter how contrived or exploitive, can feel validating to us.
Think “cult.” Think damaged people who
commit themselves to a cult in which the leader gives them the messages they so
desperately need to hear in exchange for their adulation. They don’t hear the
insincerity of the messages because they hear what they need to hear: for the
first time in their lives they feel noticed, valued, their loyalty and tokens
of that loyalty, apparently valued. That they are being fed calculated,
carefully doled out platitudes to keep them hooked they are unwilling to
accept. You could show some of these people videos of the object of their
devotion ridiculing them, multiple testimonies of a whole host of abuses by
their leader, and the faithful will not waver: they have finally found a source
of ego-gratification, strokes, emotional sustenance, and they will guard it
jealously, even from the truth.
Now, imagine someone with that hungry mindset
finding a narcissist who understands that, in order to hook the walking
wounded, all s/he needs to do is check in every day or two, say something
soothing that can be interpreted as compassion or empathy, and be very careful
to keep any nefarious deeds tightly under wraps: just act compassionate for a
few minutes every couple of days and the hurt and emotionally starved will fall
at your feet. Imagine being one of those followers: no painful, protracted
therapy, no agonies of experiencing the deferred pain collected over the years,
no being held responsible for fixing the damage caused by others, just blessed
validation and a regularly renewed sense of being understood. And if the
narcissist holds him/herself up as an authority figure, someone who makes and
enforces rules, the repetition of the original narcissistic relationship is
duplicated and this time you win…you’re getting what feels like love from that
authority figure and you will put up with anything…anything…to keep it coming.
People in the throes of this kind of
relationship…whether it is with their Nparent, a religious organization or
cult, or an internet guru, do not progress emotionally, they stay stuck right
where they are. It is against the self-interest of the leader to see the
adoring followers improve because that would mean a loss of the Nsupply they
provide (and anything else, like financial support, free labour, evangelizing or
bringing in new acolytes). And so the followers not only go into a kind of
emotional stasis, they defend the controlling narcissist from the truth. They
are the man who beats his five year old with a belt and defends himself by
demeaning himself and defending his brutal parents: “A little spanking never
hurt anyone. My parents spanked me every day…I needed it…and I turned out
fine.” No, he didn’t turn out fine: he turned out abusing his child just as he
was abused, and likely for normal childhood behaviours misinterpreted by
him…and his parents before him…as defiance or wilful disobedience. They are the
woman who impoverishes herself and diverts money from her children’s needs to
send gifts of money to televangelists or internet gurus for the validation she
feels when she receives their thanks. These are scapegoats who drank the kool
aid along with any GC sibs in the household and who believe that they owe their
abusive parents allegiance regardless of how they were treated and believe the
same not only of their own children, but of others as well. And that includes
you and any other scapegoat: you were not abused, in their eyes, but got what
you deserved. If you, like them, had been a better, more obedient, more perfect
child, your parents would not have been forced…by your behaviour…to treat you
as they did.
You may find yourself shocked when you
first come across such a person, and you may even feel blamed…and even that
your abusive parent is being validated. After all, this is not some narcissist
talking, it is another scapegoat! What does she see that has escaped you? What
does she understand that you do not? Is it possible that your parents and their
flying monkeys were right all along?
Don’t be too quick to second-guess
yourself. There is nothing in the rules of narcissism that prevents scapegoats
from becoming narcissists themselves. Even if the child in question was treated
by the family as a scapegoat, there is nothing in the human psyche that
prevents an abused child from emulating the person s/he perceives as the most
important and powerful member of the household: the abuser. Some 30% of abused
children grow up to be abusers; 70% of people who abuse their children were,
themselves, abused. Not all of us grow up to have compassion, empathy, and
understanding for those who experienced the same pain of being the scapegoat of
a narcissistic, dysfunctional family.
Since only 30% of abused children grow up
to be abusers, it stands to reason that the remainder develop compassion and
empathy for others who experienced the same kind of treatment…we are the
majority. But none of us have a brand on our foreheads that tells others where
we stand, whether we have compassion for our fellow sufferers or whether we
have chosen to identify with our abusers.
The fact that a scapegoat is clear on the
fact that she was abused and is hurt and/or angry at her abuser is not proof
against alignment with the abusers. If she had chosen to assuage her pain by
hooking up with another narcissist, especially if that narcissist is smart
enough to feed her enough crumbs to keep her bound and begging for more, the
victim is going to defend…and maybe even emulate…her present narcissist while
simultaneously condemning her original abuser. I have some experience with
this, having been clear about the wrongness of my NM’s behaviour for most of my
life, but continuing to connect with narcissistic men who abused me. Key is the
fact that they did not physically abuse me (the ones who did found themselves
suddenly alone), but abused me emotionally. Eager to please and win or earn
their love and esteem, I was dug deep into denial with these men, certain that
my performance at whatever task or responsibility that was before me would win
the love I so desperately sought and fill that aching hole where my heart
belonged. That is how you do it: you simply shut out all forms of criticism
against the narcissist who keeps feeding you crumbs while you interpret
promises of a banquet from the gesture, you just refuse to see or heed the red
flags and warnings until it all crashes down around your ears.
Not all scapegoats grow up to be
compassionate, empathetic, understanding people. Some of them grow up to seek
out other narcissists and try to get emotional sustenance from them, refusing
to see the truth and rejecting all attempts from outsiders to make them see it.
They may even turn on their family and friends with hostility and cut ties,
even engage in N-like behaviours themselves in order to preserve the relationship
with the narcissist, a relationship that feeds them mere tastes of the love and
esteem they crave…just enough to keep them craving more. Other scapegoats grow
up emulating their abusers, accepting their justifications, believing their
rationalizations, embracing the feelings of power and control their own abusive
acts provide: they become narcissists themselves, their own need for power
(Nsupply) overriding everything else.
So if you meet a fellow scapegoat and are
puzzled by the person’s apparent lack of empathy, if you meet a narcissist and
find it hard to believe that s/he was a scapegoat as a child, remember that as
much as 30% of people who grew up abused go on to take on the mantle of abuse
at their first opportunity to have power over others, to repeat the abuse their
parents perpetrated upon them. From school yard bullies to jealous boyfriends
to undermining or husband-seducing friends to abusive parents to nasty
manipulative bosses, these scapegoats, while sharing your unhappy, upbringing,
decided somewhere along the line that since they couldn’t beat ‘em, they would
join ‘em.
What you may not realize is these are among
the most dangerous narcissists of all. Rather like turncoats, they not only
have the self-interest and lack of empathy of the typical narcissist, having
been in our shoes, they have additional insights into what makes us tick. I am
convinced my NexH was one of these: raised by an indifferent, resentful,
manipulative mother and a distant, detached, self-interested father, he was an
angry, bitter man who used his prodigious intellect to attempt to make “the big
score.” His motivation was “I’ll show them!” “them” being his parents,
siblings, former classmates and co-workers. He was obsessed with being better
than someone…anyone…and because he was not above sabotaging or “sand bagging”
someone with lies and innuendo, he was ever convinced that others were focussed
on doing the same to him. Rather than take empathy and compassion away from his
neglected, even bullied childhood, he took away the “do unto others before they
do unto you” message. He couldn’t beat ‘em, so he not only joined ‘em, he
improved and refined his narcissism until he was a malignant narcissist who was
a master manipulator and admitted psychological sadist. He was not unaware of
the pain he inflicted on me, he was keenly aware of it and gratified by it
because it made him feel powerful. His early life as a scapegoat gave him the
ability to see my vulnerabilities—they were part of his make up as well—but
instead of being motivated to give me empathy and comfort, he became
increasingly cruel and manipulative because that made him feel powerful and the
power made him feel blameless and covered over his feelings of vulnerability.
I am not suggesting that you show empathy or
give forgiveness to the narcissists you know: these people have the exact same
choices you have—every time you interact with someone you have the choice of
being kind or being a bitch. Narcissists have the same opportunities for choice
that you and I have: with each interaction they can choose to be kind or to be
cruel and it is their unwavering decision to gratify their egos by making those
selfish, unkind choices that reveals their narcissism. Worst, I think, are the
ones who suffered themselves as scapegoats, who know and understand your pain,
and who choose to abuse you anyway.
As much as we would like to think that, in
meeting someone who was abused by a narcissist in childhood, we have met a
kindred spirit, that is not always the case. If we forge friendships with
others based on the assumption that having been a scapegoat in childhood, a
person is automatically rendered incapable of being a narcissist, we
disadvantage ourselves. Narcissists are, by definition, damaged people. And not
all of them got damaged by being the spoilt and coddled Golden Child.
